We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
L’AI Act, il regolamento europeo che mira a regolamentare l’uso dell’intelligenza artificiale, affronta anche il tema della tutela del diritto d’autore per quanto riguarda i dati con cui vengono addestrati i sistemi di Intelligenza Artificiale generativa.
Resta aperta invece la questione della possibilità di proteggere le opere create con strumenti e piattaforme di AI, che ha trovato risposte diverse a varie latitudini.
Daniela De Pasquale nel suo articolo a firma per Il Quotidiano Giuridico di Altalex ha analizzato la questione partendo da un caso statunitense, in cui un artista ha utilizzato 624 prompt per generare un’opera tramite un software di intelligenza artificiale e ne ha richiesto la protezione all’US Copyright Office.